The Garden, a PJ Harvey Discussion Site

Great, thanks!

I don't think the topless photo is her. I think it's this woman: http://beautywithoutirony.typepad.com/p ... _still.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

RE:

protocols wrote:I don't think the topless photo is her. I think it's this woman: http://beautywithoutirony.typepad.com/p ... _still.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

cat on the wall wrote:Maybe it's a Flash or Java script problem. Lots of new browsers and plug ins disable them as they pose secrity vulnerabilities. Just a possibility? It's more like a button rather then a link it says "show".

Anyhow, the picture I found on a MM photos collection by accident actually, because of the bubbles over the face I can't be 100% certain its PJ but when I first posted this at the old board many said it was. It probably is as one of the other pics was Bjork underwater like this.

Here is the original link to where I found the photo which I posted a few days ago in the "some bird of paradise" section:

http://beautywithoutirony.typepad.com/p ... oving.html


The person you've linked a photo to is bjork. Like I've stated I can't be certain who the woman is as there's no name of such on the site. However it being a Maria Mochnacz collection of pictures, and there being one of bjork amongst them, I do believe it's PJ and others have told me they feel the same in their opinion. Thanks

I don't think it's Bjork or PJ, the moles don't match Bjork's, and PJ has three moles above
the belly button which are replaced here by one on each rib area.

krell58 wrote:I don't think it's Bjork or PJ, the moles don't match Bjork's, and PJ has three moles above
the belly button which are replaced here by one on each rib area.

wow, that's dedication

anyone have a picture of said pj trio moles?

cat on the wall wrote:The person you've linked a photo to is bjork. Like I've stated I can't be certain who the woman is as there's no name of such on the site. However it being a Maria Mochnacz collection of pictures, and there being one of bjork amongst them, I do believe it's PJ and others have told me they feel the same in their opinion. Thanks

That's Björk? I don't even recognize her! Looking more closely, I no longer think it's the same woman in the two photos because the moles are different.

Anyway, it's obvious several people here had not seen the topless photo before and are also unaware of the discussion about its authenticity that you mention. I think the image of the topless woman should be removed or have some sort of disclaimer with it (as opposed to several posts down) because really there is no firm evidence it is P J. Indeed, there is no evidence it's not her either, but just because some people "believe" it is P J because she's close to the photographer doesn't make it true.

protocols wrote:

cat on the wall wrote:The person you've linked a photo to is bjork. Like I've stated I can't be certain who the woman is as there's no name of such on the site. However it being a Maria Mochnacz collection of pictures, and there being one of bjork amongst them, I do believe it's PJ and others have told me they feel the same in their opinion. Thanks

That's Björk? I don't even recognize her! Looking more closely, I no longer think it's the same woman in the two photos because the moles are different.

Anyway, it's obvious several people here had not seen the topless photo before and are also unaware of the discussion about its authenticity that you mention. I think the image of the topless woman should be removed or have some sort of disclaimer with it (as opposed to several posts down) because really there is no firm evidence it is P J. Indeed, there is no evidence it's not her either, but just because some people "believe" it is P J because she's close to the photographer doesn't make it true.

Done. Sorry for any confusion!

yarnforhair wrote:

krell58 wrote:I don't think it's Bjork or PJ, the moles don't match Bjork's, and PJ has three moles above
the belly button which are replaced here by one on each rib area.

wow, that's dedication

anyone have a picture of said pj trio moles?

krell58 wrote:

yarnforhair wrote:

krell58 wrote:I don't think it's Bjork or PJ, the moles don't match Bjork's, and PJ has three moles above
the belly button which are replaced here by one on each rib area.

wow, that's dedication

anyone have a picture of said pj trio moles?

ahha, thanks. i never noticed those; they're like orion's belt haha

My hard drive is totally filled up with pictures from new TheGarden *_* There is so many pieces that I've never seen before. Thanks!

I wonder if the unknown is Tori Amos.

krell58 wrote:I wonder if the unknown is Tori Amos.

I think it's Conor Oberst!

cat on the wall wrote:

protocols wrote:

cat on the wall wrote:The person you've linked a photo to is bjork. Like I've stated I can't be certain who the woman is as there's no name of such on the site. However it being a Maria Mochnacz collection of pictures, and there being one of bjork amongst them, I do believe it's PJ and others have told me they feel the same in their opinion. Thanks

That's Björk? I don't even recognize her! Looking more closely, I no longer think it's the same woman in the two photos because the moles are different.

Anyway, it's obvious several people here had not seen the topless photo before and are also unaware of the discussion about its authenticity that you mention. I think the image of the topless woman should be removed or have some sort of disclaimer with it (as opposed to several posts down) because really there is no firm evidence it is P J. Indeed, there is no evidence it's not her either, but just because some people "believe" it is P J because she's close to the photographer doesn't make it true.

Done. Sorry for any confusion!

I guess the "woman underwater" photo's not pj after all

http://www.mariamochnacz.co.uk/personal/05personal.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

protocols wrote:

krell58 wrote:I wonder if the unknown is Tori Amos.

I think it's Conor Oberst!

HAHA!

This thread is officially funny.